No submission language available for this problem.

Description

Input

The first line contains a single integer $q$ ($1 \leq q \leq 2 \cdot 10^5$) — the number of queries.

Each of the next $q$ lines describes a query. It contains one integer $t$ ($1 \leq t \leq 2$) — the type of query.

The given queries will be encoded in the following way: let $last$ be the answer to the last query of the second type that you have answered (initially, $last = 0$). If the last answer was $-1$, set $last = 1$.

• If $t = 1$, three integers follow, $l'$, $r'$, and $x'$ ($0 \leq l', r', x' < 2^{30}$), meaning that you got an update. First, do the following: $l = l' \oplus last$, $r = r' \oplus last$, $x = x' \oplus last$

  and, if $l > r$, swap $l$ and $r$.

  This means you got an update that the bitwise xor of the subarray $[l, r]$ is equal to $x$ (notice that you need to ignore updates that contradict previous updates).

• If $t = 2$, two integers follow, $l'$ and $r'$ ($0 \leq l', r' < 2^{30}$), meaning that you got a query. First, do the following: $l = l' \oplus last$, $r = r' \oplus last$

  and, if $l > r$, swap $l$ and $r$.

  For the given query, you need to print the bitwise xor of the subarray $[l, r]$. If it is impossible to know, print $-1$. Don't forget to change the value of $last$.

It is guaranteed there will be at least one query of the second type.

Output

After every query of the second type, output the bitwise xor of the given subarray or $-1$ if it is still impossible to know.

Samples

12
2 1 2
2 1 1073741822
1 0 3 4
2 0 0
2 3 3
2 0 3
1 6 7 3
2 4 4
1 0 2 1
2 0 0
2 4 4
2 0 0

-1
-1
-1
-1
5
-1
6
3
5

4
1 5 5 9
1 6 6 5
1 6 5 10
2 6 5

12

Note

In the first example, the real queries (without being encoded) are:

• 12
• 2 1 2
• 2 0 1073741823
• 1 1 2 5
• 2 1 1
• 2 2 2
• 2 1 2
• 1 2 3 6
• 2 1 1
• 1 1 3 0
• 2 1 1
• 2 2 2
• 2 3 3

• The answers for the first two queries are $-1$ because we don't have any such information on the array initially.
• The first update tells us $a_1 \oplus a_2 = 5$. Note that we still can't be certain about the values $a_1$ or $a_2$ independently (for example, it could be that $a_1 = 1, a_2 = 4$, and also $a_1 = 3, a_2 = 6$).
• After we receive all three updates, we have enough information to deduce $a_1, a_2, a_3$ independently.

In the second example, notice that after the first two updates we already know that $a_5 \oplus a_6 = 12$, so the third update is contradicting, and we ignore it.